Re: PROTO Process

[Jari Arkko <jari.arkko at piuha.net>]

I wanted to expand a little bit on what Russ was saying.

In my experience, the part of PROTO that is currently working is the 
write-ups. When it comes to the shepherding of the document through 
issues raised in last call, directorate, and IESG reviews, the authors 
and the responsible/discussing ADs seem to be most active in responding, 
explaining, suggesting text changes, etc. There are notable exceptions 
-- you know who you are -- but in many cases the shepherds are 
relatively silent. Is this a correct perception of the reality? And if 
it is, is it a desirable state of affairs or something that should be 
changed?

Jari