Out of the box proposal

[Eric Burger <eburger at standardstrack.com>]

If we really think the problem is 80% of the documents are not ready  
for IESG submission when the WG thinks it is, and if 80% of those  
documents have "classic" bugs, I would offer we do the (gasp) ITU-T  
thing and hire 3-4 full-time, PAID (i.e., IETF/IAD/ISOC staff) experts  
to review submissions before they get to the IESG.

A week or two lag in Editor Purgatory(tm) would be well worth it if it  
saves 50-100 days of AD/Author cycling.

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature