[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: PROTO Process

To: "DRAGE, Keith (Keith)" <drage at alcatel-lucent.com>
Subject: Re: PROTO Process
From: Fred Baker <fred at cisco.com>
Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 12:57:13 -0700
Authentication-results: sj-dkim-4; header.From=fred at cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/sjdkim4002 verified; );
Cc: Working Group Chairs <wgchairs at ietf.org>
Delivered-to: wgchairs at core3.amsl.com
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=609; t=1242417436; x=1243281436; c=relaxed/simple; s=sjdkim4002; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=fred at cisco.com; z=From:=20Fred=20Baker=20<fred at cisco.com> |Subject:=20Re=3A=20PROTO=20Process |Sender:=20; bh=Onr2OzyVKSo49cdp93dVBKQis6zOdJs8vL+QonerxkM=; b=WcvDo+KCgA360YX44bm1HaVXeBP89ASN0V7TBr70M6kxFnRp3yJOmqW/Us nOQI312OFZQsOJXX2/DvBwJ/adgXE+Bt+aFuns0C2AOZZOzrm/YCEn8u9uA4 5eXB+M3lWg;
In-reply-to: <28B7C3AA2A7ABA4A841F11217ABE78D6759ED778 at FRMRSSXCHMBSB3.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com>
List-archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/wgchairs>
List-help: <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: Working Group Chairs <wgchairs.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:wgchairs@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <00a901c9d2ff$368acf90$0600a8c0 at china.huawei.com> <EDC652A26FB23C4EB6384A4584434A0401693C2A at 307622ANEX5.global.avaya.com> <00b001c9d305$91dbfb20$0600a8c0 at china.huawei.com> <EDC652A26FB23C4EB6384A4584434A0401693C6F at 307622ANEX5.global.avaya.com> <00ba01c9d309$078a2470$0600a8c0 at china.huawei.com> <4A0AA228.7000809 at piuha.net> <20090513141736.GB2006 at shinkuro.com> <88DC13C1-ECA7-41AA-A039-0ED6FF3E5E1E at cisco.com> <D686C146-7494-42AA-B21D-9F84918F1B28 at standardstrack.com> <28B7C3AA2A7ABA4A841F11217ABE78D6759ED778 at FRMRSSXCHMBSB3.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com>

On May 15, 2009, at 3:20 AM, DRAGE, Keith (Keith) wrote:

For a number of the IESG comments I have seen have come from our ownarea directors, I believe they should really have been made asindividuals during the consensus building process in the WG, ratherthan as IESG comments.


personally, I prefer such.

To Lisa's comment that the ADs are great reviewers, they are. I'm notcomplaining about getting good reviews, and I agree that the WGs oftendon't do an adequate job. I'm complaining about how late in the cyclethey come, and as "QA" as opposed to "contribution".

References:
- RE: PROTO Process
  - From: David Harrington
- RE: PROTO Process
  - From: Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
- RE: PROTO Process
  - From: David Harrington
- RE: PROTO Process
  - From: Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
- RE: PROTO Process
  - From: David Harrington
- Re: PROTO Process
  - From: Jari Arkko
- Re: PROTO Process
  - From: Andrew Sullivan
- Re: PROTO Process
  - From: Fred Baker
- Re: PROTO Process
  - From: Eric Burger
- RE: PROTO Process
  - From: DRAGE, Keith (Keith)

Prev by Date: Re: Out of the box proposal
Next by Date: Re: [IAB] Out of the box proposal
Previous by thread: Re: PROTO Process
Next by thread: RE: PROTO Process
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread