RE: Out of the box proposal

[Al Morton <acmorton at att.com>]

At 07:08 PM 5/15/2009, Bernard Aboba wrote:
> ...
> Whether that outcome is satisfactory depends on one's view on what 
> should be done with low quality documents.  Should they be 
> "improved" or do we take a more darwinian view?
>
> Mike O'Dell was a classic darwinist, often arguing that "improving" 
> atrocious documents to mediocrity was a dis-service to the community.

"Atrocious"

Is it a new I-D Tracker State, or additional AD Evaluation option?

At least the presence of alternative like "Atrocious" would
recognize (what I suspect is) a fairly wide range of document
qualities that the IESG ends-up reviewing.

Al