We've received a lot of feeback that the lisp rrg conflict Friday morning is problematic. Any chance we could do something to fix this? One option might be a savi/lisp swap.
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf at mit.edu>
- Subject: Re: Friday RRG and-ietf LISP conflict
- From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko at piuha.net>
- Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 22:21:35 +0300
- Cc: lisp-ads at tools.ietf.org, savi-chairs at tools.ietf.org, Scott Brim <scott.brim at gmail.com>, darlewis at cisco.com, lixia at CS.UCLA.EDU, tony.li at tony.li
- In-reply-to: <tslr5szxu32.fsf at mit.edu>
- References: <4ADC4949.5010209 at gmail.com> <tslr5szxu32.fsf at mit.edu>
- User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817)
Despite your theory of priorities, I think that is a bad conflict based on who attends. You should ask for it to be fixed. I'm fine with the SAVI swap, even if that means I will probably miss SAVI to attend LISP. But maybe that's better than lots of folk missing either LISP or RRG. (But its another question whether the fix is possible. INT scheduling is really hard.) Jari
--- End Message ---