RE: [XCON] CPCP Requirement: de-activating a conference
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [XCON] CPCP Requirement: de-activating a conference
I do not remember seeing the existence of this separate protocol in any of the conferencing documents so far (either in SIPPING or XCON). (If I am wrong then pointers gratefully received). If it exists, then I think we should clearly identify what its scope is, if only to aid the discussion of what the other protocols may or may not do.
We clearly need a start and stop time for conferencing. At the moment the only protocol it can be in is the CPCP. If we are going to have an informed discussion about why it is not in CPCP we need to understand clearly what the alternative protocol is.
regards
Keith
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rosen, Brian [mailto:Brian.Rosen@marconi.com]
> Sent: 06 January 2004 14:14
> To: 'Even, Roni'
> Cc: 'hisham.khartabil@nokia.com'; xcon@ietf.org
> Subject: RE: [XCON] CPCP Requirement: de-activating a conference
>
>
> I don't like this idea because I think that we need a
> standardized interface
> for scheduling and "external application server" sounds very
> proprietary to
> me. I guess I could be convinced we need a separate interface, with a
> separate protocol (maybe it could be iCal), but I'm not yet convinced
> just specifying a start time in the future isn't a sufficient
> reservation
> mechanism.
>
> Brian
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Even, Roni [mailto:roni.even@polycom.co.il]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2004 7:22 AM
> To: 'Rosen, Brian'; 'hisham.khartabil@nokia.com'; xcon@ietf.org
> Subject: RE: [XCON] CPCP Requirement: de-activating a conference
>
>
> Brian,
> My suggestion is not to have reservation in the conference policy. The
> conference policy is used by the focus according to the
> conference framework
> and the focus is not the place for handling reservation. I think that
> reservation is handled by an external application server that
> will start the
> conference using CPCP at the time when the conference
> scheduled time has
> arrived. The focus may use the conference duration
> information in order to
> notify the participants that it the conference end-time is coming and
> terminate the conference. Extension of the should be done
> using CPCP either
> by the participant or an application server.
> Roni
>
> *************************************
> Roni Even
> VP Product Planning
> Polycom Israel
>
> Tel: +972-3-9251200
> Cell: +972-55-481099
> email:roni.even@polycom.co.il
> *******************************************
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rosen, Brian [mailto:Brian.Rosen@marconi.com]
> Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 4:25 PM
> To: 'hisham.khartabil@nokia.com'; xcon@ietf.org
> Subject: RE: [XCON] CPCP Requirement: de-activating a conference
>
>
> Again, I'm worried about "privileged users". I think we need
> to finish
> some discussions we started a while ago that essentially are
> semantics.
> What is an "inactivated" conference, and how does it differ from a
> conference that can be re-instantiated (a weekly meeting for example)?
>
> Brian
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: hisham.khartabil@nokia.com [mailto:hisham.khartabil@nokia.com]
> > Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 7:57 AM
> > To: xcon@ietf.org
> > Subject: [XCON] CPCP Requirement: de-activating a conference
> >
> >
> > This is in reference to requirement REQ-B9 in
> > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-xcon-cpcp-reqs-00.txt
> >
> > REQ-B9: It MUST be possible to inactive a conference for defined
> > period of time.
> >
> > There are start and stop times for a conference. A conference
> > might live for days, weeks or even months. Should a
> > conference policy, using CPCP, allow a privileged user to
> > de-activate a conference for a period of time within the
> > start and stop times of a conference? Examples are
> > administrator is performing some maintenance.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Hisham
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > XCON mailing list
> > XCON@ietf.org
> > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xcon
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> XCON mailing list
> XCON@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xcon
>
> _______________________________________________
> XCON mailing list
> XCON@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xcon
>
_______________________________________________
XCON mailing list
XCON@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xcon
Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.