RE: [XCON] CPCP Issue 20: The need for Refer List

[hisham.khartabil at nokia.com]

If we envision that access rights to modify such lists will be different to different users, then leaving the lists separated is best.

/Hisham

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ext Paul Kyzivat [mailto:pkyzivat at cisco.com]
> Sent: 13.August.2004 17:18
> To: Khartabil Hisham (Nokia-TP-MSW/Helsinki)
> Cc: xcon at ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [XCON] CPCP Issue 20: The need for Refer List
> 
> 
> Perhaps what is needed is a single list of of users the focus is 
> supposed to bring to the meeting somehow. An attribute in each entry 
> could specify *how* this user is to be brought in - invite, refer, ...
> This attribute could be either authoritative or just a hint. And it 
> could be optional.
> 
> 	Paul
> 
> hisham.khartabil at nokia.com wrote:
> > In the XCON meeting at the interim, we agreed that a 
> separate refer list is needed, mainly because: 
> >  - The list is not a list of users that the focus invites 
> to join the conference (dial-out list)
> >  - The ACL (now using common policy) is not the place to 
> list users a focus refers to the conference
> > 
> > People raised concerns about why we need 2 list, those 
> concerns where raised by the same people that advocated a 
> separate list for refer-list in the interim ;) Text will be 
> added describing those needs.
> > 
> > Regards,
> > Hisham
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > XCON mailing list
> > XCON at ietf.org
> > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xcon
> > 
> 
> 

_______________________________________________
XCON mailing list
XCON at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xcon