RE: [XCON] CPCP Issue 28: <pin> and <password>
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [XCON] CPCP Issue 28: <pin> and <password>
Hi Aki,
I don't understand your argument here. The way PSTN users are authorised to join a conference is through a PIN. The condition is if they know the PIN, then they get in the conference. You cannot know the user behind a PSTN number and therefore need an authorisation rule based on PIN.
Perhaps I didn't fully understand your proposal, can you re-state?
Thanks,
Hisham
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Niemi Aki (Nokia-NRC/Helsinki)
> Sent: 13.September.2004 17:41
> To: Khartabil Hisham (Nokia-TP-MSW/Helsinki)
> Cc: ext Paul Kyzivat; XCON WG
> Subject: RE: [XCON] CPCP Issue 28: <pin> and <password>
>
>
> Why do you need this condition at all? As I said in a previous post,
> this is all about configuring authentication for a specific conference
> access and nothing authorization specific.
>
> Cheers,
> Aki
>
> On Mon, 2004-09-13 at 17:12, Khartabil Hisham (Nokia-TP-MSW/Helsinki)
> wrote:
> > I agree that there is no need to separate the two. Perhaps password
> > alone will suffice if we think of digits entered by a user
> in the PSTN
> > domain as a password string.
> >
> > Maybe change it to <passcode>?
> >
> > Regards,
> > Hisham
> >
>
>
_______________________________________________
XCON mailing list
XCON at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xcon
Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.