Re: [XCON] CPCP Issue 36: Removing Common Policy XML from Schema

[Jonathan Rosenberg <jdrosen at dynamicsoft.com>]

I think its a bad idea to re-defined the schema for common-policy. For 
problem (1), you can just define a new condition - <any-identity>, and 
leave the existing identity in common policy alone. For (2), its fine to 
say it has no meaning.

-Jonathan R.

hisham.khartabil at nokia.com wrote:

> This issue affects both draft-ietf-xcon-cpcp-00.txt and
> draft-ietf-xcon-conference-policy-privileges-00.txt.
>
> Both these drafts re-define the common-policy schema defined in the
> common policy draft. There are 2 reasons for this:
>
> 1. We define the <any> and <external-list> elements in <identity>.
> The identity element is in common-policy defines <id> but does not
> allow the extensibility of the <identity> element.
>
> 2. The <sphere> element defined in common-policy has limited use in
> presence and is not useful for CPCP.
>
> The latter can be easily fixed with some text saying to ignore the
> <sphere> element if it appears. The former is harder to fix and
> requires some schema re-design in common-policy.
>
> Any ideas what to do here? I'll forward this email to geopriv for
> their comments and suggestions.
>
> Regards, Hisham
>
> _______________________________________________ XCON mailing list 
> XCON at ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xcon

--
Jonathan D. Rosenberg, Ph.D.                600 Lanidex Plaza
Chief Technology Officer                    Parsippany, NJ 07054-2711
dynamicsoft
jdrosen at dynamicsoft.com                     FAX:   (973) 952-5050
http://www.jdrosen.net                      PHONE: (973) 952-5000
http://www.dynamicsoft.com

_______________________________________________
XCON mailing list
XCON at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xcon