RE: [XCON] Discussion Point 1: Referring to Sets of Meetings

["Brian Rosen" <br at brianrosen.net>]

I think we live with what iCal can do.  If it can do any/all of these
things, you get it.  If it can't fagedaboudit.

We may wish to make sure that even if they are expressible in iCal
standards, that the favorite calendaring systems that can interoperate with
iCal will accept such constructions.

Brian

> -----Original Message-----
> From: xcon-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:xcon-bounces at ietf.org] On Behalf Of
> Adam Roach
> Sent: Tuesday, February 08, 2005 3:18 PM
> To: xcon at ietf.org
> Subject: [XCON] Discussion Point 1: Referring to Sets of Meetings
> 
> [as chair]
> 
> For recurring conferences, is it necessary to be able to identify "the
> next occurrence" of a conference?
> 
> Is it necessary to be able to identify "all future occurrences" of a
> conference?
> 
> Is it necessary to be able to identify "all conferences between time X
> and time Y?"
> 
> For any of the preceding abilities, if we decide that we need to do so,
> how do we do so?
> 
> There was some discussion of mechanism surrounding these techniques,
> which largely centered around passing an iCal object to a server that
> implements the XCON protocols, and receiving back a URI that referred to
> those conference instances that satisfied the time(s) described by the
> iCal object. The instances could then be manipulated as a group using
> that returned URI.
> 
> /a
> 
> _______________________________________________
> XCON mailing list
> XCON at ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xcon
> 




_______________________________________________
XCON mailing list
XCON at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xcon