Re: [XCON] Partial notifications for the XCON event package

[Oscar Novo <oscar.novo at ericsson.com>]

True, I didn't remember the new state elements defined in the event
packages... So, if we define them, we need a new MIME type. 

Oscar

On Wed, 2008-01-30 at 18:59 +0200, Gonzalo Camarillo wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> the current event package draft has a whole section explaining why a new 
> MIME type is needed. The reason it gives is the presence of state 
> attributes in new elements. However, if we do not define new state 
> attributes by use xml patch operations instead, we could reuse the old 
> MIME type, as you suggest. Of course, we would need to define a new one 
> for partial notifications based on xml patch operations.
> 
> Does anybody else have an opinion on this issue?
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Gonzalo
> 
> 
> Oscar Novo wrote:
> > Yes, I believe we should use the same MIME type as in RFC4575 and a
> > different MIME type for the 'xml patch operation' option. 
> > 
> > Oscar
> > 
> >> what do you exactly mean by "100% backward compatible"? Do you mean that 
> >> we should be using the same MIME type as in RFC 4575?
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >>
> >> Gonzalo
> >>
> > 
> 



_______________________________________________
XCON mailing list
XCON at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xcon