Re: [XCON] Partial notifications for the XCON event package
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [XCON] Partial notifications for the XCON event package
Hi Adam,
the current draft (00) defines such a new MIME type. So, we should be OK.
Cheers,
Gonzalo
Adam Roach wrote:
> On 1/30/08 10:59 AM, Gonzalo Camarillo wrote:
>> the current event package draft has a whole section explaining why a
>> new MIME type is needed. The reason it gives is the presence of state
>> attributes in new elements. However, if we do not define new state
>> attributes by use xml patch operations instead, we could reuse the old
>> MIME type, as you suggest. Of course, we would need to define a new
>> one for partial notifications based on xml patch operations.
>>
>> Does anybody else have an opinion on this issue?
>
> Sorry for the slow response on this topic -- the document landed in the
> right place, but I wanted to remind everyone that one of the key reasons
> we're using a new MIME type is because the apps-area MIME experts
> suggested that such a change is warranted due to our moving from Schema
> to Relax NG. If we decide to open the question again, we'll need to make
> sure the proper apps people are involved in the conversation.
>
> /a
_______________________________________________
XCON mailing list
XCON at ietf.org
http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xcon
Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.