![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
[as chair] Duddy, Sean (Sean) wrote:
Hi Folks, Is this new callflow doc about CCMP callflows ? If yes, why is its publication date April 2010 and the ccmp August 09? I would have thought these end dates should be alligned...
The logic here was that the callflows document depends on the protocol, but not the other way around (cf. RFC 3261 and RFC 3665).
That said, we're happy to adjust the schedule according to working group consensus (subject to reality checks -- we may require additional people to commit to being authors before moving milestones earlier). Does anyone else want to weigh in on the timeline?
I think draft-ietf-xcon-event-package-01.txt should be changed...
draft-ietf-xcon-event-package has been handed off to the IESG for publication. We could pull it back if we found a critical flaw. Retracting it for anything less would be considered unnecessarily disruptive.
/a