[XCON] Consensus call: Blueprint Cloning
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[XCON] Consensus call: Blueprint Cloning



[as chair]

At the face-to-face meeting in Stockholm, we had a discussion regarding whether a conference object that was created from a blueprint retains a link to blueprint from which it was cloned. The examples document currently assumes that no such link exists. There was consensus among those in attendance that this is the proper behavior; the rationale voiced was that the blueprint will often be controlled by a different authority than the conferences cloned from it, and it would therefore be undesirable to have changes to the blueprint propagate to active conferences.

If you have an opinion on this topic -- either in support of the foregoing conclusion or against it -- please voice it on the list.

/a

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.