[XCON] Consensus call: Blueprint Cloning
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[XCON] Consensus call: Blueprint Cloning
[as chair]
At the face-to-face meeting in Stockholm, we had a discussion regarding
whether a conference object that was created from a blueprint retains a
link to blueprint from which it was cloned. The examples document
currently assumes that no such link exists. There was consensus among
those in attendance that this is the proper behavior; the rationale
voiced was that the blueprint will often be controlled by a different
authority than the conferences cloned from it, and it would therefore be
undesirable to have changes to the blueprint propagate to active
conferences.
If you have an opinion on this topic -- either in support of the
foregoing conclusion or against it -- please voice it on the list.
/a
Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.