[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [xmpp] SCRAM as MTI?

From: Kurt Zeilenga <Kurt.Zeilenga at Isode.com>
To: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter at stpeter.im>
Cc: XMPP <xmpp at ietf.org>
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 23:58:57 +0100
In-reply-to: <4AAE6984.8040201 at stpeter.im>
References: <4AAE6984.8040201 at stpeter.im>

On Sep 14, 2009, at 5:04 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

The SASL SCRAM mechanism is currently in IETF Last Call:

http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-sasl-scram-07.txt

This mechanism is intended to replace DIGEST-MD5. Does it make sensefor

the XMPP WG to specify SCRAM as mandatory-to-implement?


Yes.

-- Kurt

References:
- [xmpp] SCRAM as MTI?
  - From: Peter Saint-Andre

Prev by Date: Re: [xmpp] SCRAM as MTI?
Next by Date: Re: [xmpp] [Standards] definition of common attribute 'id'
Previous by thread: Re: [xmpp] SCRAM as MTI?
Next by thread: Re: [xmpp] [Standards] definition of common attribute 'id'
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.