-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 9/23/09 10:22 AM, Jack Moffitt wrote: > This might also be a good time to bring up the XML-NAMES > well-formedness issues and address those as well. I'd have to go back > and look at what the consensus (if any) was for that. But I seem to > recall a proposal that suggested we disallow other prefixes in the > top-level stream element and not throw XML parse errors on namespace > well-formedness issues. I posted about that on August 14: http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/xmpp/current/msg00155.html I think that the text I posted incorporates the list consensus, so I'd be curious to see if others agree. Peter - -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkq6U9QACgkQNL8k5A2w/vylhQCgs6xLRMnopJD5K10hvv1YjE7t b8UAoLAQmRVFsyDMRlxw/ap2cKjrVsoF =xzRj -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.