[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [xmpp] Use of namespace in RFC 3920

From: Curtis King <cking at mumbo.ca>
To: xmpp at ietf.org
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 21:42:47 -0700
In-reply-to: <75a410780909230901o1f705f94uee27599ffc3a31e1 at mail.gmail.com>
References: <75a410780909230901o1f705f94uee27599ffc3a31e1 at mail.gmail.com>

On 2009-09-23, at 9:01 AM, Jehan Pagès wrote:

There are other stuffs to change in the RFC related to this
problematic. But for now let's launch the discussion from this point.
:

What does this all gain us? I think there needs to-be a real benefitto making such a change and I don't see one. Only a lot of potentialpain. IMHO, we should be tightening the scope of XML which can be sentnot loosening it.

ck

References:
- [xmpp] Use of namespace in RFC 3920
  - From: Jehan Pagès

Prev by Date: Re: [xmpp] Use of namespace in RFC 3920
Next by Date: [xmpp] Fwd: Use of namespace in RFC 3920
Previous by thread: Re: [xmpp] Fwd: Use of namespace in RFC 3920
Next by thread: [xmpp] Fwd: Use of namespace in RFC 3920
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.