-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 10/27/09 5:06 PM, Alexey Melnikov wrote: > Peter Saint-Andre wrote: > >> To me, the major remaining issue is internationalized addresses. I have >> reviewed the full suite of IDNAbis documents with an eye toward usage in >> XMPP, but that is only one aspect of i18n since we also need to deal >> with JID localparts and "resourceparts". Should we continue using >> Stringprep or take the IDNAbis approach of whitelisting certain >> characters? >> > I think the answer to this question would depend on StringPrep BOF > outcome. I was hoping to have it in Hiroshima, but it is delayed till > the following IETF. Perhaps the XMPP WG can identify the issues that it thinks are important, for input to the Stringprep BoF. Given that XMPP is one of the main users of Stringprep, such an exercise might be useful for us and for people working on Stringprep / i18n. Peter - -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkrp7gMACgkQNL8k5A2w/vyokACghSbmtUlUBK4JGnJZTwgmKVm6 M7oAnA4mI9kOgW075R7FDEPOMfWjzN3G =OIhi -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.