Re: [xmpp] Call for XMPP Agenda Items

[Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov at isode.com>]

Peter Saint-Andre wrote:

> On 10/27/09 5:06 PM, Alexey Melnikov wrote:
>  
>
> > Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> >    
> >
> > > To me, the major remaining issue is internationalized addresses. I have
> > > reviewed the full suite of IDNAbis documents with an eye toward usage in
> > > XMPP, but that is only one aspect of i18n since we also need to deal
> > > with JID localparts and "resourceparts". Should we continue using
> > > Stringprep or take the IDNAbis approach of whitelisting certain
> > > characters?
> > >      
> > I think the answer to this question would depend on StringPrep BOF
> > outcome. I was hoping to have it in Hiroshima, but it is delayed till
> > the following IETF.
> >    
> Perhaps the XMPP WG can identify the issues that it thinks are
> important, for input to the Stringprep BoF. Given that XMPP is one of
> the main users of Stringprep, such an exercise might be useful for us
> and for people working on Stringprep / i18n.
>  
I think this is a good idea.
As XMPP is conflicting with KRB-WG, I would like to suggest that we use 
SASL slot to discuss this. Opinions?