Re: [xmpp] 3921bis: ack of subscription request

[Joe Hildebrand <joe.hildebrand at webex.com>]

(as individual)

I assume this would go back to all of the resources of the subscribing user.
There are a set of UI designers for whom the difference between "unknown"
and "offline" is significant; can we put in a note for them that says that
this unavailable reply does not imply anything about the actual presence
state of the user until the subscription request is accepted?


On 11/17/09 11:26 AM, "Peter Saint-Andre" <stpeter at stpeter.im> wrote:

> 3921bis says:
> 
>    As a way of acknowledging receipt of the presence subscription
>    request, the contact's server MAY send a presence stanza of
>    type "unavailable" from the bare JID of the contact to the bare
>    JID of the user.
> 
> Do we have consensus on adding this to the spec?
> 
> /psa
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> xmpp mailing list
> xmpp at ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xmpp

-- 
Joe Hildebrand