I've added the following parenthetical remark: (the user's client MUST NOT assume that this ack provides presence information about the contact, since it comes from the contact's bare JID and is received before the subscription request has been approved) On 11/17/09 2:32 PM, Joe Hildebrand wrote: > (as individual) > > I assume this would go back to all of the resources of the subscribing user. > There are a set of UI designers for whom the difference between "unknown" > and "offline" is significant; can we put in a note for them that says that > this unavailable reply does not imply anything about the actual presence > state of the user until the subscription request is accepted? > > > On 11/17/09 11:26 AM, "Peter Saint-Andre" <stpeter at stpeter.im> wrote: > >> 3921bis says: >> >> As a way of acknowledging receipt of the presence subscription >> request, the contact's server MAY send a presence stanza of >> type "unavailable" from the bare JID of the contact to the bare >> JID of the user. >> >> Do we have consensus on adding this to the spec? >> >> /psa >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> xmpp mailing list >> xmpp at ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xmpp
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.