2009/11/17 Tobias Markmann <tmarkmann at googlemail.com>: > On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 10:56 PM, Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter at stpeter.im> > wrote: >> >> Sure. But reality is not always so clean. :) I doubt that anyone has >> ever seen this error on the wire, but it's defined just in case... > > Well, you can always reckon on some strange Prosody dev that made it respond > mechanism-too-weak if client choose ANONYMOUS but the server isn't set to > support it. This strange Prosody dev (not the one that added the error) fails to understand the problem with this response, it being more specific than "invalid-mechanism". You're making a mountain out of a molehill, over an error that will never appear to a "correct" client. Hence I don't particularly care whether it gets changed in Prosody - patches welcome :) Matthew
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.