(sorry for sending off-list first, I changed email clients) On 2010-01-29 13:52, Waqas Hussain wrote: > On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 5:39 PM, Jonathan Schleifer > <js-xmppwg at webkeks.org <mailto:js-xmppwg at webkeks.org>> wrote: > Hm, this sounds to me like killing resources all together. Why not > let the user decide? For example, if the user gives all resources > the same priority, all resources get the message. If the user > decides to use different priorities, only the one with the higehst > gets it (if 2 are sharing the highest prio, both should get it). > This doesn't kill resources, this just explicitly allows servers to be > configured such that priority doesn't affect message delivery. And then it kills resources for me if my server admin decides one day to change the way it works. -- Maciek xmpp:machekku at uaznia.net
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.