[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [xmpp] 3921bis: delivery of messages addressed to bare JIDs

From: Maciek Niedzielski <machekku at uaznia.net>
To: xmpp at ietf.org
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 14:39:05 +0100
In-reply-to: <9b58f4551001281601s360a7c3dlb793c6757f20b6e9 at mail.gmail.com>
References: <4B621B30.8090508 at stpeter.im> <9b58f4551001281601s360a7c3dlb793c6757f20b6e9 at mail.gmail.com>

On 2010-01-29 01:01, Jack Moffitt wrote:
>> Currently some XMPP services broadcast messages addressed to a bare JID
>> instead of delivering those messages only to the highest-priority
>> resource(s). The highest-priority rule is a legacy of the original
>> jabberd 1.x codebase and I don't see a strong reason to forbid other
>> message delivery styles. Therefore I propose a change to Section 8.3.1.1
>> of 3921bis.
> 
> Why not remove priorities altogether? Are they used for anything else
> but this?

Negative priority has special meaning.

-- 
Maciek
 xmpp:machekku at uaznia.net

References:
- [xmpp] 3921bis: delivery of messages addressed to bare JIDs
  - From: Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [xmpp] 3921bis: delivery of messages addressed to bare JIDs
  - From: Jack Moffitt

Prev by Date: Re: [xmpp] 3921bis: delivery of messages addressed to bare JIDs
Next by Date: Re: [xmpp] 3921bis: delivery of messages addressed to bare JIDs
Previous by thread: Re: [xmpp] 3921bis: delivery of messages addressed to bare JIDs
Next by thread: Re: [xmpp] 3921bis: delivery of messages addressed to bare JIDs
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.