[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [xmpp] 3921bis: probe to full JID?

From: Ben Schumacher <Ben.Schumacher at webex.com>
To: xmpp at ietf.org
Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2010 12:56:54 -0700
In-reply-to: <201002011129.12739.justin at affinix.com>
References: <4B6217EC.7020909 at stpeter.im> <201001311244.32330.justin at affinix.com> <4B672431.7010209 at webex.com> <201002011129.12739.justin at affinix.com>

On 02/01/2010 12:29 PM, Justin Karneges wrote:

Basically, the server should return the most recently sent presence to the JID
doing the probing, whether directed or undirected.  So, no, if you send me
directed presence and then I probe you, I would not expect to receive
your "real" (undirected) presence.

Therein lies the rub. I do not want to have to shove ever presence sentinto a DB, DHT, whatever to meet these requirements. Hence the point ofthe recommendation re: probe + unavailable.

Ben

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [xmpp] 3921bis: probe to full JID?
  - From: Peter Saint-Andre

References:
- [xmpp] 3921bis: probe to full JID?
  - From: Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [xmpp] 3921bis: probe to full JID?
  - From: Justin Karneges
- Re: [xmpp] 3921bis: probe to full JID?
  - From: Ben Schumacher
- Re: [xmpp] 3921bis: probe to full JID?
  - From: Justin Karneges

Prev by Date: Re: [xmpp] 3921bis: probe + unavailable
Next by Date: Re: [xmpp] 3921bis: probe + unavailable
Previous by thread: Re: [xmpp] 3921bis: probe to full JID?
Next by thread: Re: [xmpp] 3921bis: probe to full JID?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.