Paul Aurich píše v Ne 07. 02. 2010 v 16:33 -0800: > On 2010-02-07 16:26, Jiří Zárevúcky wrote: > > Paul Aurich píše v Ne 07. 02. 2010 v 16:16 -0800: > >> Section 2.1.6 reads, in part: > >> If there are no contacts in the roster, then the server MUST return > >> an IQ-result containing a child <query/> element that in turn > >> contains no <item/> children (e.g., the server MUST NOT return an > >> empty <iq/> stanza element). > >> > > > > That's right. > > > >> I understand the intention of this, but it conflict with the Roster > >> Versioning section (2.6.2), which requires a response to be either the > >> full roster -or- an empty <iq/> stanza. > >> > > > > I don't see any conflict. Can you please be more specific? > > Nevermind, I misparsed the parenthetical in 2.1.6. > Thought so. Happens to me all the time. :) (missed this part before) > On a much smaller note, section 2.6 references RFC 3921 as a whole > twice (it looks like these sections were lifted directly from > XEP-0237). The latter of these [c|sh]ould just reference section > 2.1.6. Good catch. I've never noticed that.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Toto je =?UTF-8?Q?digit=C3=A1ln=C4=9B?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_podepsan=E1?= =?UTF-8?Q?_=C4=8D=C3=A1st?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_zpr=E1vy?=
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.