Re: [yam] WGLC is now over for draft-ietf-yam-rfc1652bis-pre-evaluation-00

[Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov at isode.com>]

Tony Hansen wrote:

> The WGLC is now over for draft-ietf-yam-rfc1652bis-pre-evaluation-00.
>
> Since there was *no* discussion about the two issues that were raised 
> (IANA mail-parameters

If the WG reopens the document, then this should be done.
However this is not a big deal, and I can always talk directly to IANA.

> and ABNF changes), no further changes should be made to the document 
> at this point.

Agreed.

> This means that we need to proceed to the next step with the document 
> as it currently stands. And that next step is to get Alexey to 
> schedule the document for the soonest IESG telechat.

I will be on holidays during the September 24th telechat, so it would be 
better for me to put the document on the next telechat after that date.

> Alexey, SM has been collecting the deployment reports together that 
> we've received so far. We'll be posting them to the wiki soon.

Sounds good to me.

> If anyone has any objections to this plan, please speak up now.
>
>     Tony Hansen
>     co-chair
>
> Tony Hansen wrote:
>
> > The WGLC ends soon. These are the only comments that have been made 
> > on draft-ietf-yam-rfc1652bis-pre-evaluation-00 before it goes to the 
> > IESG.
> >
> > Any responses to these questions, or other issues to bring up?
> >
> >     Tony Hansen
> >     tony at att.com
> >
> > S Moonesamy wrote:
> >
> > > This is a summary of draft-ietf-yam-rfc1652bis-pre-evaluation-00 
> > > issues:
> > >
> > > 14 Aug 2009 - Tony made a comment about the IANA mail-parameters 
> > > registry.
> > >
> > > 16 Aug 2009 - Tony started a discussion about a deployment report 
> > > for 8BITMIME
> > >
> > > 17 Aug 2009 - Alexey proposed using the RFC 5234 syntax for ABNF
> > >
> > > Please comment on the above.  If there are any other issues (e.g. 
> > > proposed changes, non-changes, etc.) or comments on the template 
> > > layout or text, please post them to this mailing list.
> > >
> > > The Working Group Last Call ends on ending on September 11.