Alessandro Vesely wrote:
You appear to be missing the basics of IETF process understanding.Yes, my very little IETF experience is essentially limited to mailing list discussions, thus your latter point may be correct. I've read a fair amount of procedural guides and RFCs, and make a good-faith effort to comply with them, though.
Perhaps you should review the repeated focus on "rough consensus". You've been persistent in pressing your points. I haven't noticed your developing support, but perhaps you have and can document it. Failing that, yes, you are wasting the group's time.As for interpreting counter-postings as indicating that your points are valid or worthy, you would be missing the alternative explanation that the postings are either tutorial or defensive against /others/ taking the points as worthy.
That is precisely what I am doing with this, and my previous, posting.I think enough of us have posted more than enough such notes. Any more responses like this would, themselves, merely waste mailing list bandwidth...
d/ -- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking bbiw.net
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.