[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [yam] A suggestion for restraint

From: Barry Leiba <barryleiba.mailing.lists at gmail.com>
To: Yet Another Mail Working Group <yam at ietf.org>
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 19:24:51 -0400
In-reply-to: <4AAEC6EF.7050601 at dcrocker.net>
References: <4AAD1C6C.8060500 at dcrocker.net> <6c9fcc2a0909141134ue080cen7fd19b552fdc3fbf at mail.gmail.com> <4AAEC6EF.7050601 at dcrocker.net>

> I think the problem is that the group DID deal with it but then kept
> responding to a recalcitrant participant who was unhappy with the
> resolution.
>
> IMO.

D'accord.  IMO as well.

Barry

References:
- [yam] A suggestion for restraint
  - From: Dave CROCKER
- Re: [yam] A suggestion for restraint
  - From: Barry Leiba
- Re: [yam] A suggestion for restraint
  - From: Dave CROCKER

Prev by Date: Re: [yam] A suggestion for restraint
Next by Date: Re: [yam] A suggestion for restraint
Previous by thread: Re: [yam] A suggestion for restraint
Next by thread: Re: [yam] A suggestion for restraint
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.