Barry Leiba wrote:
What I think, and what I've said all along, is that it's reasonable for the IESG to require updates to the old documents to address modern concerns, and necessary for the WG to do them. That may, in some cases, involve nothing more than explaining why the protocol shouldn't be changed now, but it's still important to call the issues out.
Even in the constrained terms you put it, you are permitting quite a bit of additional work for getting from Draft to Full.
d/ -- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking bbiw.net
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.