[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [yam] Request for comments: Working Group procedure

From: Barry Leiba <barryleiba.mailing.lists at gmail.com>
To: dcrocker at bbiw.net
Cc: yam at ietf.org
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 14:25:54 -0400
In-reply-to: <4ADCAE84.40606 at dcrocker.net>
References: <6.2.5.6.2.20091019080704.03000e30 at elandnews.com> <6c9fcc2a0910191054u78f281d7j4a4a04f38362b265 at mail.gmail.com> <4ADCAE84.40606 at dcrocker.net>

> Even in the constrained terms you put it, you are permitting quite a bit of
> additional work for getting from Draft to Full.

Yes.  I consider it important.

Barry

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [yam] Request for comments: Working Group procedure
  - From: Dave CROCKER

References:
- [yam] Request for comments: Working Group procedure
  - From: S Moonesamy
- Re: [yam] Request for comments: Working Group procedure
  - From: Barry Leiba
- Re: [yam] Request for comments: Working Group procedure
  - From: Dave CROCKER

Prev by Date: Re: [yam] Request for comments: Working Group procedure
Next by Date: Re: [yam] Request for comments: Working Group procedure
Previous by thread: Re: [yam] Request for comments: Working Group procedure
Next by thread: Re: [yam] Request for comments: Working Group procedure
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.