Re: [yam] Request for comments: Working Group procedure

[Tony Hansen <tony at att.com>]

Dave, we've always considered the possibility that we may get feedback 
saying that moving a particular RFC to full standard really does need 
more than a minimal amount of work. Isn't this an example of that principal?

And we've always stated that if that happens, at that point the document 
should be removed from YAM's initial charter. Work on it can continue 
"off the charts" as individual work or be postponed until after the 
initial YAM charter is finished, but the YAM WG won't be spending its 
cycles on it during the initial charter time period.

	Tony Hansen

Dave CROCKER wrote:
> Barry Leiba wrote:
> > > Even in the constrained terms you put it, you are permitting
> > > quite a bit of additional work for getting from Draft to Full.
> >
> > Yes.  I consider it important.
>
>
> Folks,
>
> So, I think this defines a significant disparity on a significant issue 
> about the basic process of going from Draft to Full.
>
> As such, it ought to get some focussed discussion by the group.
>
> d/