[yam] Proposed changes to review template

[Chris Newman <Chris.Newman at Sun.COM>]

Based on the IESG evaluation record of 
draft-ietf-yam-rfc1652bis-pre-evaluation-00, I believe the questions we 
asked the IESG were too terse and thus were not understood by the IESG and 
did not accomplish our charter's stated goal for the pre-review.


I propose the latter two questions be expanded for future templates as 
follows:

>   o  Does the IESG believe any other proposed changes are necessary to
>      satisfy IESG requirements to advance to Full Standard?

o  Excluding the previous proposed changes and expected IESG support for 
technically substantive IETF last call feedback, does the IESG believe any 
additional changes are critical to advance this document from draft to full 
standard?  If so, please provide sufficient information so the WG can 
address these issues prior to IETF last call or determine the document is 
inappropriate for the YAM WG to process at this time.

>   o  Does the IESG consider the downward references acceptable for a
>      Full Standard?

o  Does the IESG consider the downward references acceptable for a full 
standard?  If not, please cite which specific downward reference or 
references are problematic and why so the WG can address these issues prior 
to IETF last call or determine the document is inappropriate for the YAM WG 
to process at this time.

		- Chris