Re: [yam] Status: draft-ietf-yam-rfc1652bis-pre-evaluation-00

[Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov at isode.com>]

Alexey Melnikov wrote:
> Ned Freed wrote:
[...]
> > > It doesn't make sense to approve extensions first, then
> > > run into the possibility of not approving changes to the document
> > > being  extended.  The WG should move the main documents first instead
> > > of the dependent documents.
> > And again, if that's supposed to be generally applicable rule, this 
> > effort is
> > effectively over.
> I wouldn't say it is over, but we will certainly discuss
s/discuss/come to conclusion/
> much quicker if YAM's process experiment is successful or not.
>
>
> I am largely agreeing with the rest of your note.