#7: RFC 5321 Section 2.2.2: add a bullet for the definition of extensions
-----------------------------------------+----------------------------------
Reporter: sm+ietf at … | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone:
Component: 5321bis-smtp-pre-evaluation | Version:
Severity: - | Keywords:
-----------------------------------------+----------------------------------
Comment about RFC 5321 posted by Alessandro Vesely on 12 Nov 2009
Section 2.2.2: add a bullet for the definition of extensions.
It should say that "Future SMTP extensions SHOULD explicitly specify if
they are valid on the Submission port." [RFC 4409, Sect. 7]
Rationale: not 100% sure, because while RFC 4409 says that, it doesn't
formally update RFC 2821 (nor RFC 2476 updated RFC 1869.)
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/yam/current/msg00164.html
--
Ticket URL: <http://tools.ietf.org/wg/yam/trac/ticket/7>
yam <http://tools.ietf.org/yam/>
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.