#8: RFC 5321 Section 4.1.1.3 Recipient: missing text
-----------------------------------------+----------------------------------
Reporter: sm+ietf at … | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone:
Component: 5321bis-smtp-pre-evaluation | Version:
Severity: - | Keywords:
-----------------------------------------+----------------------------------
Comment about RFC 5321 posted by Alessandro Vesely on 12 Nov 2009
Section 4.1.1.3 Recipient: missing text.
I don't have specific text to propose here, but I'd recommend relegating
some or all of the text meant to illustrate source routes to an historical
appendix. Instead, I would move here the discussion on failed recipients
(both 4xx and 5xx cases), which I currently find difficult to locate.
Rationale: Banning source routes had been a hot issue at the time of the
DRUMS. Nowadays, non-existence of source routes could simply be implied by
the fact that they are not mentioned in the Full Standard.
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/yam/current/msg00164.html
--
Ticket URL: <http://tools.ietf.org/wg/yam/trac/ticket/8>
yam <http://tools.ietf.org/yam/>
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.