[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [yam] Ambiguities in RFC 5321



John R Levine wrote:
(d) 554 No SMTP service here. Fail.

I think we can split hairs about whether it means "no SMTP service at all"
vs. "no SMTP service for you", although it's easy enough to define so that it
doesn't matter and the client does the same thing either way.

This leads down the slippery slope of needing to define a long list of differential reasons the service does not exist:

Doesn't exist for you
Doesn't exist outside of office hours
Doesn't exist on Tuesdays.
Doesn't exist on Holidays.
Doesn't exist for specific IP Address ranges.
Doesn't exist for hosts associated with .biz domains

etc.

And if the above list seems silly, consider that each one is likely to be of intersest -- and even utility -- for some serveroperator and/or some client operator.

d/
--

  Dave Crocker
  Brandenburg InternetWorking
  bbiw.net

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.