Re: [yam] Notes (i.e., decisions taken) in WG session

[Pete Resnick <presnick at qualcomm.com>]

On 11/21/09 12:34 PM, Ned Freed wrote:
> > Hums
>
> > Disband: 0
> > 1-step: 1
> > Try 1-step and 2-step same time: 0
> > Continue 2-step: 4 (+1)
>
> > 5322 first: 3
> > 5321 first: 3
> > both: 3
>
> > Whatever is ready, go.
>
> Pete, while I appreciate the information about the WG session, 
> especially since
> AFAIK neither a session summary nor any minutes have been posted to 
> the list, I
> think we need to follow proper proceure here.
>
> A hum was taken at a F2F on a matter of fundamental importance to the 
> group:
> What to do next. My understanding of proper procedure is that the 
> question
> should then be taken to the list for further discussion and in order 
> to check
> and see if the consensus on the list is the same as in the room. (And 
> if it
> isn't, the list wins.)
Your humble note taker and hum counter agrees completely, and hangs his 
head in shame that he worded the sense of the room the way he did. I 
leave it to the chair to make clear what is being asked of the list and 
to confirm (or disconfirm) the consensus of the list.

pr