[yam] meta question on draft-ietf-yam-5321bis-smtp-pre-eval

[Tony Hansen <tony at att.com>]

There is a meta question that needs to be answered about 
draft-ietf-yam-5321bis-smtp-pre-eval before we can WGLC it. It was 
raised as part of Alessandro's posting, but no one has been addressing 
it. To whit:

Should our pre-evaluations provide an overview of known errata and how 
they are going to be dealt with?

Alessandro's posting suggested that we have a subsection of section 2.4.

Some Cons:
	Makes putting a pre-eval take slightly longer.

Some Pros:
	Makes putting the final doc together take a short amount of
	time.
	Eliminates hand-waving on places we know changes are going to
	occur.
	It may make getting it through the IESG easier.

What do people think?

	Tony Hansen
	tony at att.com