Re: [yam] meta question on draft-ietf-yam-5321bis-smtp-pre-eval

[S Moonesamy <sm+ietf at elandsys.com>]

Hi Alessandro,
At 11:44 PM 11/22/2009, Alessandro Vesely wrote:
> FWIW, I heuristically reasoned that given that there are two steps 
> involved, there may be some advantages if the work is being divided 
> more or less equally between them. However, I hadn't taken the trac 
> tool into account. If WGLCs also concern issues of trac tickets 
> linked to the relevant component, it could be enough to include 
> links, in sections 2.4 and 2.5, that reflect the current WG's 
> stance. If the authors deem more convenient to maintain trac tickets 
> than pre-evaluation drafts, that is.

I am using the Trac tickets to track the issues for each 
document.  As it is more of an tool for the Working Group, the links 
should not be used in the pre-evaluation I-D.  The actual record of 
the discussion is the archive for this mailing list.

Regards,
S. Moonesamy
YAM WG Secretary