[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [yam] Looking for implementations of RFC 3848 (ESMTP and LMTP Transmission Types Registration)

From: Ned Freed <ned.freed at mrochek.com>
To: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov at isode.com>
Cc: IETF SMTP list <ietf-smtp at imc.org>, Yet Another Mail Working Group <yam at ietf.org>
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 15:43:40 -0800 (PST)
In-reply-to: "Your message dated Tue, 24 Nov 2009 23:30:09 +0000" <4B0C6C81.7000402 at isode.com>
References: <4B0C6C81.7000402 at isode.com>

I would like to move RFC 3848 to Draft Standard, so I am collecting
information for the implementation report.
Please let me know if you know of implementations (MTAs/MDAs) that
generate such parameters (in particular
ESMTPA/ESMTPS/ESMTPSA/LMTPA/LMTPS/LMTPSA) and clients that parse
Received headers and analyze/check the corresponding WITH parameter values.

Sun's MTA generates any/all of these as appropriate.

Ned

References:
- [yam] Looking for implementations of RFC 3848 (ESMTP and LMTP Transmission Types Registration)
  - From: Alexey Melnikov

Prev by Date: [yam] Looking for implementations of RFC 3848 (ESMTP and LMTP Transmission Types Registration)
Next by Date: Re: [yam] Looking for implementations of RFC 3848 (ESMTP and LMTP Transmission Types Registration)
Previous by thread: [yam] Looking for implementations of RFC 3848 (ESMTP and LMTP Transmission Types Registration)
Next by thread: Re: [yam] Looking for implementations of RFC 3848 (ESMTP and LMTP Transmission Types Registration)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.