[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [yam] Looking for implementations of RFC 3848 (ESMTP and LMTP Transmission Types Registration)

From: Tony Finch <dot at dotat.at>
To: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov at isode.com>
Cc: IETF SMTP list <ietf-smtp at imc.org>, Yet Another Mail Working Group <yam at ietf.org>
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 14:02:08 +0000
In-reply-to: <4B0C6C81.7000402 at isode.com>
References: <4B0C6C81.7000402 at isode.com>

On Tue, 24 Nov 2009, Alexey Melnikov wrote:
>
> Please let me know if you know of implementations (MTAs/MDAs) that generate
> such parameters (in particular ESMTPA/ESMTPS/ESMTPSA/LMTPA/LMTPS/LMTPSA)

Exim, since version 4.42 released on 2004-08-27.

> and clients that parse Received headers and analyze/check the
> corresponding WITH parameter values.

SpamAssassin uses them to detect message submission hops.

Tony.
-- 
f.anthony.n.finch  <dot at dotat.at>  http://dotat.at/
GERMAN BIGHT HUMBER: SOUTHWEST 5 TO 7. MODERATE OR ROUGH. SQUALLY SHOWERS.
MODERATE OR GOOD.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [yam] Looking for implementations of RFC 3848 (ESMTP and LMTP Transmission Types Registration)
  - From: Mark Martinec

References:
- [yam] Looking for implementations of RFC 3848 (ESMTP and LMTP Transmission Types Registration)
  - From: Alexey Melnikov

Prev by Date: Re: [yam] Looking for implementations of RFC 3848 (ESMTP and LMTP Transmission Types Registration)
Next by Date: Re: [yam] Looking for implementations of RFC 3848 (ESMTP and LMTP Transmission Types Registration)
Previous by thread: Re: [yam] Looking for implementations of RFC 3848 (ESMTP and LMTP Transmission Types Registration)
Next by thread: Re: [yam] Looking for implementations of RFC 3848 (ESMTP and LMTP Transmission Types Registration)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.