[yam] IESG evaluation of draft-ietf-yam-rfc1652bis-pre-evaluation-02.txt
IESG Secretary <iesg-secretary@ietf.org> Fri, 15 January 2010 18:21 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@core3.amsl.com>
X-Original-To: yam@ietf.org
Delivered-To: yam@core3.amsl.com
Received: by core3.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 30) id 7BF4A3A6819; Fri, 15 Jan 2010 10:21:51 -0800 (PST)
From: IESG Secretary <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
To: yam@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <20100115182151.7BF4A3A6819@core3.amsl.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2010 10:21:51 -0800
Cc: iesg@ietf.org
Subject: [yam] IESG evaluation of draft-ietf-yam-rfc1652bis-pre-evaluation-02.txt
X-BeenThere: yam@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: iesg@ietf.org
List-Id: Yet Another Mail working group discussion list <yam.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/yam>, <mailto:yam-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/yam>
List-Post: <mailto:yam@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:yam-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/yam>, <mailto:yam-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2010 18:21:51 -0000
The proposed changes in draft-ietf-yam-rfc1652bis-pre-evaluation-02.txt, Section 2, seem suitable for Full Standard. The downward references to [RFC5321], [RFC2045], [RFC2046] seem reasonable as well. The current members of IESG have not identified any other changes that would be necessary. Though the current IESG hopes to have found all relevant issues in this review, please note that this review does not supersede or replace any of the remaining stages of the IETF process for rfc1652bis. IESG, 15 January 2010
- [yam] IESG evaluation of draft-ietf-yam-rfc1652bi… IESG Secretary