Re: [Isms] pre11 comments

To: "David Harrington" <ietfdbh at comcast.net>
Subject: Re: [Isms] pre11 comments
From: Wes Hardaker <wjhns1 at hardakers.net>
Date: Thu, 03 Jul 2008 20:01:43 -0700
Cc: isms at ietf.org
Delivered-to: ietfarch-isms-web-archive at core3.amsl.com
Delivered-to: isms at core3.amsl.com
Dkim-signature: v=0.5; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=hardakers.net; h=received:from:to:cc:subject:organization:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-type; q=dns/txt; s=wesmail; bh=wTWjvkYU84GyHx4TG81/RRXrBNc=; b=VQuTtf2DV/eZHeonPFw/uFUE8TJoSjBXplWlVEJeiIu1uqtd58xp6Juj0S7GqY7cQq1hSioA78BMe0RaBFkhxCNdhZcweoJb6cLmqKo1gt7IMQV1X2+bEICjmlso7LcvAop4uCg6LsooBRSiAmAUn+4RR0Xi7brNDdN3hdP376Y=
In-reply-to: <024601c8dd81$e7c02c70$51f780de@china.huawei.com> (David Harrington's message of "Fri, 4 Jul 2008 10:58:45 +0800")
List-archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/isms>
List-help: <mailto:isms-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: Mailing list for the ISMS working group <isms.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:isms@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isms>, <mailto:isms-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isms>, <mailto:isms-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Organization: Sparta
References: <006401c8dc30$bac0af30$51f780de@china.huawei.com> <sd63rmy615.fsf@wes.hardakers.net> <4F599A473EF04ECD99F4C358B291245E@xpsuperdvd2> <sdskuqwoli.fsf@wes.hardakers.net> <00f401c8dd70$e2a997a0$6401a8c0@NEWTON603> <024601c8dd81$e7c02c70$51f780de@china.huawei.com>
Sender: isms-bounces at ietf.org
User-agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) XEmacs/21.4.21 (linux, no MULE)

>>>>> On Fri, 4 Jul 2008 10:58:45 +0800, "David Harrington" <ietfdbh at comcast.net> said:

DH> I think the case Wes is concerned with happens 1% of the time, and
DH> with thoughtful configuration can be reduced to 0.00763% of the time
DH> (OK, I'll settle for 80/20).

Then why was the VACM designed to operate differently based on the
security protocol?  Was that over-done and it should have been a simple
vc/v3 enum instead?

-- 
Wes Hardaker
Sparta, Inc.
_______________________________________________
Isms mailing list
Isms at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isms

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Isms] pre11 comments
  - From: David Harrington

References:
- [Isms] pre11 comments
  - From: David Harrington
- Re: [Isms] pre11 comments
  - From: Wes Hardaker
- Re: [Isms] pre11 comments
  - From: David B. Nelson
- Re: [Isms] pre11 comments
  - From: Wes Hardaker
- Re: [Isms] pre11 comments
  - From: David B. Nelson
- Re: [Isms] pre11 comments
  - From: David Harrington

Prev by Date: Re: [Isms] pre11 comments
Next by Date: Re: [Isms] pre11 comments
Previous by thread: Re: [Isms] pre11 comments
Next by thread: Re: [Isms] pre11 comments
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Re: [Isms] pre11 comments

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.