Re: [Isms] pre11 comments
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Isms] pre11 comments
Jeffrey Hutzelman writes...
> In this way, the difference between an SSH user and a TLS user
> becomes very clear in VACM, and the mapping from SSH username to
> securityName and back is well defined.
>
> Comments?
That may be useful for deployments where there are distinct namespaces for
SSH, TLS, Kerberos, Telnet, Unix login, and what-have-you. I'm sure there
are such deployments. On the other hand, another way to address the issue
of divergent namespaces is to use a single AAA service (or at least a single
back-end user database) for all authentication purposes within an
organization. The ability to use existing AAA infrastructures (with a
common user namespace) was one of the primary goals of the ISMS work, no?
Universal single sign-on s still an elusive "holy grail" but it is often
achieved within the confines of a single organization.
_______________________________________________
Isms mailing list
Isms at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isms
Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.