Re: [midcom] security recommendations in MIDCOM MIB draft

[Melinda Shore <mshore at cisco.com>]

On 7/13/07 9:58 AM, "Wes Hardaker" <wjhns1 at hardakers.net> wrote:
> MIBCOM devices MUST implement SNMPv3 to allow for operators to rely on
> it's features in order to protect their traffic.  Operators should use
> make use of SNMPv3, other protocols providing cryptographic protection
> or physical separation to to ensure MIBCOM traffic is secured.

Yes, that's pretty much where I am, too (note that it's actually
"midcom," although "mibcom" is a pretty great portmanteau jobbie).

Melinda

_______________________________________________
midcom mailing list
midcom at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/midcom