Re: [midcom] security recommendations in MIDCOM MIB draft

[Wes Hardaker <wjhns1 at hardakers.net>]

>>>>> "MS" == Melinda Shore <mshore at cisco.com> writes:

MS> On 7/13/07 9:58 AM, "Wes Hardaker" <wjhns1 at hardakers.net> wrote:
>> MIBCOM devices MUST implement SNMPv3 to allow for operators to rely on
>> it's features in order to protect their traffic.  Operators should use
>> make use of SNMPv3, other protocols providing cryptographic protection
>> or physical separation to to ensure MIBCOM traffic is secured.

MS> Yes, that's pretty much where I am, too (note that it's actually
MS> "midcom," although "mibcom" is a pretty great portmanteau jobbie).

Drat (I know that of course).  You know I fixed that a few times before
rearranging what I was saying again?  You can tell what 3 letter acronym
I type too often ;-)

sigh...
-- 
Wes Hardaker
Sparta, Inc.

_______________________________________________
midcom mailing list
midcom at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/midcom