Re: [MMUSIC] Proposed approach for NICE

[Jonathan Rosenberg <jdrosen at cisco.com>]

Well, it was mostly really TSV AD conservatism ;)

Anyway, it seems like there is general interest in this document in the 
form proposed. I got some private feedback along those lines too. I'll 
submit a revised document and we can evaluate whether to move forward 
with that or not. Unfortunately odds are very high I'll miss the mmusic 
session Friday, but hopefully we can have someone else lead a discussion 
on it.

Thanks,
Jonathan R.

Rémi Denis-Courmont wrote:
> On Monday 07 July 2008 18:04:54 ext Ari Keranen, you wrote:
>> IMO, this would be a really important part of the NICE document. The
>> pacing formulas etc. in the ICE draft seem to be well thought out for
>> RTP but I'm not that convinced of the non-RTP case. For example, minimum
>> RTO of 500ms seems quite high to me. Some discussion and design
>> guidelines or maybe even a few "timer profiles" that implementors could
>> reference to could be useful.
> 
> As far as I remember, it used to be 100ms, but that was too fast for WAN radio 
> links.
> 

-- 
Jonathan D. Rosenberg, Ph.D.                   499 Thornall St.
Cisco Fellow                                   Edison, NJ 08837
Cisco, Voice Technology Group
jdrosen at cisco.com
http://www.jdrosen.net                         PHONE: (408) 902-3084
http://www.cisco.com
_______________________________________________
mmusic mailing list
mmusic at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic


o-8859-1"; Format="flowed"
Sender: mmusic-bounces at ietf.org
Errors-To: mmusic-bounces at ietf.org

Well, it was mostly really TSV AD conservatism ;)

Anyway, it seems like there is general interest in this document in the 
form proposed. I got some private feedback along those lines too. I'll 
submit a revised document and we can evaluate whether to move forward 
with that or not. Unfortunately odds are very high I'll miss the mmusic 
session Friday, but hopefully we can have someone else lead a discussion 
on it.

Thanks,
Jonathan R.

Rémi Denis-Courmont wrote:
> On Monday 07 July 2008 18:04:54 ext Ari Keranen, you wrote:
>> IMO, this would be a really important part of the NICE document. The
>> pacing formulas etc. in the ICE draft seem to be well thought out for
>> RTP but I'm not that convinced of the non-RTP case. For example, minimum
>> RTO of 500ms seems quite high to me. Some discussion and design
>> guidelines or maybe even a few "timer profiles" that implementors could
>> reference to could be useful.
> 
> As far as I remember, it used to be 100ms, but that was too fast for WAN radio 
> links.
> 

-- 
Jonathan D. Rosenberg, Ph.D.                   499 Thornall St.
Cisco Fellow                                   Edison, NJ 08837
Cisco, Voice Technology Group
jdrosen at cisco.com
http://www.jdrosen.net                         PHONE: (408) 902-3084
http://www.cisco.com
_______________________________________________
mmusic mailing list
mmusic at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic