"Provisioning, Autodiscovery, and Signaling in L2VPNs", Eric Rosen, 5-May-06. ( bytes)

Provider Provisioned Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks (L2VPNs) may have different "provisioning models", i.e., models for what information needs to be configured in what entities. Once configured, the provisioning information is distributed by a "discovery process". When the discovery process is complete, a signaling protocol is automatically invoked to set up the mesh of Pseudowires (PWs) that form the (virtual) backbone of the L2VPN. This document specifies a number of L2VPN provisioning models, and further specifies the semantic structure of the endpoint identifiers required by each model. It discusses the distribution of these identifiers by the discovery process, especially when discovery is based on the Border Gateway Protocol (BGP). It then specifies how the endpoint identifiers are carried in the two signaling protocols that are used to set up PWs, the Label Distribution Protocol (LDP) and the Layer 2 Tunneling Protocol (L2TPv3).

"L2VPN OAM Requirements and Framework", Dinesh Mohan, Ali Sajassi, Simon Delord, Philippe Niger, 14-Jul-08. ( bytes)

This draft provides framework and requirements for Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks (L2VPN) Operation, Administration and Maintenance (OAM). The OAM framework is intended to provide OAM layering across L2VPN services, Pseudo Wires (PWs) and Packet Switched Network (PSN) tunnels. The requirements are intended to identify OAM requirement for L2VPN services (i.e. VPLS, VPWS, and IPLS). Furthermore, if L2VPN services OAM requirements impose specific requirements on PWOAM and/or PSN OAM, those specific PW and/or PSN OAM requirements are also identified.

"ARP Mediation for IP Interworking of Layer 2 VPN", Eric Rosen, Himanshu Shah, Giles Heron, Vach Kompella, 4-Jun-09. ( bytes)

The VPWS service [L2VPN-FRM] provides point-to-point connections between pairs of Customer Edge (CE) devices. It does so by binding two Attachment Circuits (each connecting a CE device with a Provider Edge, PE, device) to a pseudowire (connecting the two PEs). In general, the Attachment Circuits must be of the same technology (e.g., both Ethernet, both ATM), and the pseudowire must carry the frames of that technology. However, if it is known that the frames' payload consists solely of IP datagrams, it is possible to provide a point-to-point connection in which the pseudowire connects Attachment Circuits of different technologies. This requires the PEs to perform a function known as "ARP Mediation". ARP Mediation refers to the process of resolving Layer 2 addresses when different resolution protocols are used on either Attachment Circuit. The methods described in this document are applicable even when the CEs run a routing protocol between them, as long as the routing protocol runs over IP.

"Multicast in VPLS", Rahul Aggarwal, Yuji Kamite, Luyuan Fang, Yakhov Rekhter, 13-Jul-09. ( bytes)

This document describes a solution for overcoming a subset of the limitations of existing VPLS multicast solutions. It describes procedures for VPLS multicast that utilize multicast trees in the sevice provider (SP) network. One such multicast tree can be shared between multiple VPLS instances. Procedures by which a single multicast tree in the SP network can be used to carry traffic belonging only to a specified set of one or more IP multicast streams from one or more VPLSes are also described.

"VPLS Interoperability with CE Bridges", Dinesh Mohan, Ali Sajassi, 29-Sep-08. ( bytes)

One of the main motivations behind VPLS is its ability to provide connectivity not only among customer routers and servers/hosts but also among customer IEEE bridges. VPLS is expected to deliver the same level of service that current enterprise users are accustomed to from their own enterprise bridged networks or their Ethernet Service Providers. When CE devices are IEEE bridges, then there are certain issues and challenges that need to be accounted for in a VPLS network. The majority of these issues have currently been addressed in the IEEE 802.1ad standard for provider bridges and they can be leveraged for VPLS networks. This draft extends the PE model described in RFC 4664 based on IEEE 802.1ad bridge module and illustrates a clear demarcation between IEEE bridge module and IETF LAN emulation module. By doing so, it describes that the majority of interoperability issues with CE bridges can be delegated to 802.1ad bridge module, thus removing the burden on IETF LAN emulation module within a VPLS PE.

"Framework and Requirements for Virtual Private Multicast Service (VPMS)", Yuji Kamite, Frederic JOUNAY, Ben Niven-Jenkins, Deborah Brungard, Lizhong Jin, 13-Jul-09. ( bytes)

This document provides a framework and service level requirements for Virtual Private Multicast Service (VPMS). VPMS is defined as a Layer 2 VPN service that provides point-to-multipoint connectivity for a variety of Layer 2 link layers across an IP or MPLS-enabled PSN. This document outlines architectural service models of VPMS and states generic and high level requirements. This is intended to aid in developing protocols and mechanisms to support VPMS.

"LDP Extensions for Optimized MAC Address Withdrawal in H-VPLS", Pranjal Dutta, 26-Apr-09. ( bytes)

[RFC4762] describes a mechanism to remove or unlearn MAC addresses that have been dynamically learned in a VPLS Instance for faster convergence on topology change. The procedure also removes the MAC addresses in the VPLS that does not require relearning due to such topology change. This document defines an extension to MAC Address Withdrawal procedure with empty MAC List [RFC4762], which enables a Provider Edge(PE) device to remove only the MAC addresses that needs to be relearned. Conventions used in this document In examples, "C:" and "S:" indicate lines sent by the client and server respectively.

"Extensions to VPLS PE model for Provider Backbone Bridging", Ali Sajassi, Florin Balus, Raymond Zhang, 12-May-09. ( bytes)

IEEE 802.1ah standard [IEEE802.1ah], also known as Provider Backbone Bridges (PBB) defines an architecture and bridge protocols for interconnection of multiple Provider Bridge Networks (PBNs). PBB was defined in IEEE as a connectionless technology based on multipoint VLAN tunnels. MSTP is used as the core control plane for loop avoidance and load balancing. As a result, the coverage of the solution is limited by STP scale in the core of large service provider networks. PBB on the other hand can be used to attain better scalability in terms of number of customer MAC addresses and number of service instances that can be supported. Virtual Private LAN Service (VPLS) [RFC4762] provides a solution for extending Ethernet LAN services, using MPLS tunneling capabilities, through a routed MPLS backbone without running (M)STP across the backbone. As a result, VPLS has been deployed on a large scale in service provider networks. This draft discusses extensions to the VPLS PE model required to incorporate desirable PBB components while maintaining the Service Provider fit of the initial model.

Return to Internet-Draft directory.

Return to IETF home page.