newtrk-2----Page:4
1 2 3 4 5 6
|
Implications Drafts should indicate the label which applies and define more explicitly how the draft relates to existing labels (does it update, replace, obsolete, set requirements, provide best current practices, extends …. ) I assume that one paragraph would be enough. Some problems: Would this be yet another thing that the IESG needs to check? Would this create more work for the Secretariat / RFC Editor? Would we need to appoint experts (as in expert reviewers) to do consistency checks on the labels? Some gains: Provide a cross-referencing tool for people who actually implement & use the stuff we do here. Provide a better tool for maintenance of the RFC series. Provide better scaling for the RFC series. |